This is a very important question, but it is only half of the story. To provide a complete picture, we also need to know “Have you been harmed by a legal medicine?” Then, we could make some statistics, and calculate costs and benefits of both approaches.
To have an ideal, perfectly complete image, we also would need two more questions: “When in need of medical support, a) have you been helped by non-medical personnel, b) have you been left behind by medical personnel?”
Numbers-wise, the results may be interesting, but still incomplete. We should first define what is “illegal” and decide whether something “illegal” in one location but “legal” in any other place of the world is really “illegal”.
As a complement to the picture, it would also be interesting to answer a question: “In the situation when your medical conditions became diagnosed/detected/reported, have legal medicine workers provide you with effective preventive measures to contain the situation? If not, how much of the resulting health damages may be attributed to the withdrawal or absence of such preventive measures?”
What appears an easy question is no longer such if we would like to assess all obvious factors in play.
Yes, of course. Interesting. This discussion and analysis has a lot more depth than I could cover in a single post. We also need to be aware that illegal is a judgement, not a physical reality, that cured - or benefited, and also harmed are judgements. Many cures entail harm. In addition, for example, there are many, for example, who would judge themselves harmed by a vaccination, and others who might claim to be harmed, or at least threatened by those who refuse a vaccination treatment. I study cure, not preventatives, and the point I want to make is that most curatives and curative actions are currently illegal. And that most "legal" medicines (permitted by prescription law, not legal outside of the definitined legal use) medicines are not curative.
Your article, short and easy, I thought initially, is actually a huge challenge to the entire healthcare system, from legal to patient. Theoretically definitions are already in place, along with rules and licenses. But there are so many habits and historical attitudes worldwide, some are good, some are better. If we are talking about a global village and one civilization, why don’t we choose the best protocols and treatment modalities from all over the place? Obviously, folk medicine is another factor. Undeniable, effective, amazingly cheap, it could be (is?) seen as a threat by the pharma, but then, are we (the species) here to feed the pharma alone? Shouldn’t we have a list of priorities in which finances are the last item?
Considering the complexity, I’m afraid it’s a lost case and will remain theoretical for ever, unless someone makes lobbying illegal and nationalizes the whole medical sector. Ha.
Thanks for commenting. We need more discussion. Yes, we need a sense of humor as well.
I study and write about cure. It is important to understand that CURED is not defined, neither in theory nor in practice, for most diseases. We have no medical no scientific test of cured for most cases of disease, even those that are easily cured, like the common cold.
When we study cure, we can also see two important things.
First - most illnesses and most cases of illness are easily cured, so we ignore the cures and claim "there is no cure for... the common cold, influenza, measles, COVID..."
Second, once we realize that an illness is cured by addressing the cause, and start studying actual cases - we quickly learn that for every case of disease there are many different cures and the best cure depends on the case, not on the disease name. In the case of scurvy, for example, there is one theoretical "treatment" and different references recommend different doses - all avoid the word cure. James Lind, on the other hand, wrote in the 1750s, that there were many cures for scurvy. I wrote a paper that scratched the surface of curing scurvy, and found many more types of scurvy and many more cures than were considered by James Lind or anyone else who has studied scurvy since Lind's famous paper. . http://theoryofcure.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/A_Treatise_of_Curing_Scurvy_Theory_and_P.pdf
Many of those cures would be considered "non-standard" treatments, and might be illegal in today's medical systems which function with "Standards of Care" but no Standards of Cure. .
The reason why “care” or SOPs are defined, while “cure” is absent, may be very simple: we don’t know how to cure. The whole healthcare system is based on “treating” symptoms, if at all. You can check it very easily: ask any doctor how many patients they have cured. If they are honest, they will say “None”. Because the system is focused on “treating” illnesses (if at all) - while illness (or discomfort or distress of any sort) is only a symptom of the patient being unbalanced.
The medical science does not know it and will never know. Basically, it cannot know how to treat or cure because we have no access to the complete information about a) the human body, b) the interactions of the human body with the local environment), c) the interactions of the human body with non-local factors. The scientist can only see a snapshot of the patient, and an incomplete one. The medical practitioner is by definition so arrogant in their approach to the patient that they “diagnose” the patient without even visiting their home, place of rest, workplace or without learning about their daily interactions with other people - which are the strongest stressors of all.
Paradoxically enough, psychologists or psychiatrists (who both are non-medical professions) have better insights and can resolve physiological problems faster and more efficiently - but they cannot speak about “curing” a supposedly mental or emotional disturbance.
Since we do not observe the true causes, and in their full presentation, there cannot be any cure. This may be the reason why modern medicine is so obsessed with numbers and numerical results of tests and examinations - changing the numbers as a result of swallowing some artificial substance is defined in medicine as positive treatment outcome. Not “cure”, but at least some justification to absurd prices they want for their non-curing.
Clearly, you should not start any discussion about self-resolving health conditions: modern medicine has no idea what it is, why it happens, and how to tap into this curing potential.
Being an arrogant troglodyte from the bush, and with no respect whatsover for authority, academia, scientists, doctors, nurses, or pharmaceutical establishments, I have no hesitation in saying that black slave has CURED my skin cancers.
I am so arrogant that, despite the outraged protestations of my betters and superiors, in September 2021, I lodged a legal challenge against the Australian Northern Territory Chief Medical Officer, citing section 51 of the Australian Constitution, the Privacy Act 1988, and the Nuremberg Code. I even conveyed the document copies to the ill-fated Nuremberg II committee in London, with copies for the Police Union. (To their historical credit, in the NT, police refused to attack mRNA jab mandate protestors).
The criminal CMO, Heggie, was rewarded with the post of NT Administrator, but two Chief Ministers thus far, have resigned.
Yes this is a perspective I have explored in depth. Most doctors avoid the word cure, and many patients avoid it as well. Most medicines make no claim to cure - most cures are illegal in some way.
However, when we step out if the medical paradigm, it's not hard to define cure.
"An illness is cured when its present cause has been successfully addressed." An elementary illness, also known as an element of illness, has a single present cause. Addressing the cause produces a cure. If the cause occurs again, it's a new case of illness.
Most diseases, however, cannot be diagnosed until there are multiple present causes - so most diseases require multiple cures. "Modern medicine" wants to find a single cure for any disease - and that flawed logic leads to the belief that every disease is incurable. Modern medicine also wants cures to be permanent, a nonsense goal. If the cause occurs anew, a new case of illness will result.
> An illness is cured when its present cause has been successfully addressed.
> An elementary illness, also known as an element of illness, has a single present cause.
However attractive it sounds (easy work ahead), I doubt the underlying processes are that simple. For the starters, we don’t know what constitutes the beginning, what is the starting point of any life process or any process within a living organism. The first person who comes to this understanding will be the undisputed tyrant of the new world, because finding the single point of origin may mean finding the key to immortality. No chance for our current state of the mind. Let us keep it this way for our own sake.
From what we can analyze, any illness is a multi-faceted unbalancing of the processes in the mind-body-soul. A simple headache produces an avalanche of reactions in various systems. We can overcome some by the force of the will or at the expense of more serious unbalancing of some areas, but the complexity is overwhelming. A white pill can take it all away in a few minutes, but it’s only about partial chemistry. Symptoms are gone, but the reason(s) remain secret. Are they of electrical, magnetic, frequency, color, or any other nature? We don’t know. We actually make problems much worse with our modern medical technology, like magnetic resonance - literally killing the source magnetic field of the human body. The patient won’t die from this procedure, so we “assume” it is “safe”, but the truth is we don’t know because we don’t follow up on people who were subject to a systemic destruction of their magnetic field by the MR procedure. One such session could be potentially enough to unbalance the whole body for life - and then a single present cause is simply a wrong approach.
TCM cures are an amazing source of information and insight. You have problems with finances which make you lose self-confidence and make you prone to physical weakening? Easy. Lose your shoes, walk barefoot in contact with the natural earth, and your problems are gone after two weeks. For a Chinese practicing TCM this is obvious and is 100% verifiable. For us it may seem absurd. Why? Because our medicine doesn’t even look at the interaction of the human body with 5 or 6 primordial elements, not to mention spatial (geographical) orientation and timing (within a day, week, month or year) where and how we sleep, work, eat or converse in business or family matters. All these activities are governed by different factors, but we don’t care. What if “they” are right and all our medical approach is wrong? Healing practice certainly suggests so, as well as our history - we survived thousands of years without a doctor, so why would one be suddenly indispensable AD 2024?
All in all, I think that trying to resolve the “cure” problem within the medical paradigm is a wrong approach from the start. The medical field is limited by design and cannot be otherwise. Life processes, or causes of stressors and spontaneous resolutions, go beyond physical, measurable, predictable A>B equations. What if the “illness” does not exist? What if the comprehensive balance of the body is the source of baseline health? Psychosomatic approaches seem to verify this attitude, just as regular psychology does. How to self-define and maintain this comprehensive balance and to prevent its disturbing? Are we leaving the curing realm and entering the realm of prescriptions for living in harmony?
I am still working through your article with your definitions/concepts, but thanks for this clear expose of how cures have been made illegal through history. I will be sharing this article among my networks tomorrow to see if we can help find more folks with such anecdotes to share.
One must be careful in choice of words, but let me say that in ten years I have used black salve (Cansema) to cure some 42 skin cancers, including one doubly clinically diagnosed (biopsy, twice) squamous cell carcinoma. The carcinoma was biopsied/ removed surgically and clinically diagnosed, which grew back in twenty years, but much bigger. Another biopsy-proved squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed but I packed the hole with black salve (no sleep with the pain for a week) and after 12 days the cancer fell out, as it always does with this treatement. Acting on online expert advice (I won't mention the familiar names) I am currently taking one Ivermectin tablet per day as a preventive. It seems to be working. I know of 20 cures for cancer and I know that no Sickness Industry treatment cures, unless it is surgery of a large area, followed by plastic surgery, which is expensive and is only offered to those who can afford it. All other treatments eventually kill the patient.
May I add that I have conceived of a cure for this genocidal plague but I will only reveal this after the event.
Thanks for your comment Tony. I had not heard of black salve except in the work of Harry Hoxsey and his cancer cure claims - also illegal. Did you notice, in your cured cases - that our medical systems have no test for "cancer cured"? They don't dare to develop any CURED test that is independent of the treatment, because it would open the door to many real cures including illegal ones.
Our medical systems generally claim that "cancer is incurable" but a simple analysis of the data show most cases of cancers are cured.
I suppose I should add that black salve comes with caveats. The ointment works in exactly 12 days but if one wants to contain it permanently, one must eliminate sugar from one's diet. Alcohol too. A whole lot of foods are proscribed and others recommended.
I have read of medical investigations into black salve but they deliberately sabotage the tests. They know it works and will stall this forever. I have been attacked by hospital doctors for using black salve, and once, when a lip cancer treatment caused one side of my face to blow up like a baloon (the cancer must have spread unnoticed), and the pain was above ten, so I went to the hospital for pain killers. I refused the PCR test (knowing it was contaminated) and the doctor refused to give me painkillers.
Great article, Tracy! Yes, a whole-food plant-based diet (as per Dr. Joel Fuhrman's Nutritarian approach) cured me of being overweight, because even regular aerobic exercise did not take the weight off. Also, I do not get sick like I did before making the dietary change, as in "not ever"!
Thanks Sharine. Is Fuhrrman's book an illegal cure? It says "This book is not intended as a substitute for medical advice from a physician. A physician should be consulted if one is on medication or if there are any symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical attention. This book was current as of October 2010, and as new information becomes available through research, experience, or changes to product contents, some of the data in this book may become invalid. You should seek the most up to date information on your medical care and treatment from your physician or health care professional." Perhaps that doesn't quite make it illegal, it's just illegal to "claim it cures,' anything... Because a doctor should have been consulted. And everyone knows doctors cannot "cure" someone who is overeweight. There is also no test of "cured" for any condition that might have been cured by Furhman... So it's probably illegal to "call it a cure" and certainly illegal to market it as a "cure."
"So it's probably illegal to "call it a cure" and certainly illegal to market it as a "cure.""
Precisely. He can't say his recommended diet cured someone's diabetes, for example (even though the diet was indeed the cure), because the medical board (of psychopathic tyrants) will pull his license.
Yes. What happens when diabetes is cured? Nothing. If anyone claims a cure there are only two options, either they are lying or the diagnosis was wrong. Diabetes is incurable. Case closed.
Left to my own devices , a youtube video made by an unknown angel introduced me to EMU oil as the only way to heal pressure wounds . My patient was a relative , and I was alone , so I was able to keep the wounds that appeared at bay with a non stick pad soaked in %100 Emu oil , after simply washing the wound with soap and water . She met her appointed hour , happened to be 11:11 am , a blessing for me , with her skin intact , no wounds . That was a prayer I asked god for and that is what happened . Now , I went on to another assignment , where my patient had total medical observation and had been suffering from terrible wounds - I told the patients in charge person that I had a solution to the problem , and brought some in to work . What Havoc ! Finally , it was forbidden , even though it was healing her wounds . Now I was in a bind , who was I working for ?? The patient , or the person who supposedly was in charge ? I would sneak in the oil onto her body , but could not do the correct application , which was to let it soak on , with a pad . Her feet healed , the Skin Doctor could not believe what he was seeing . I told him I could explain . He had no interest . He just said ' You are angels ' -- but did not want to know . Finally , I was forbidden to sing to my patient , and was supposed to let her cry herself to sleep at night . My heart started racing uncontrollably that night , and I had to quit my assignment . I went through this with Breastfeeding my own children , with "Letting them Play " etc etc . There is an avalanche of people now who were raised with love of power and rules , which has nothing to do with healing and love . I hope that your book gets some traction -- Oh , and when I told that Mayo Clinic doctor about the Emu oil, rather than GAUZE AND SALINE SOLUTION ???? on a lower spinal pressure wound ???? He became red in the face with fury , that I , an un educated care giver , would dare conflict with his care regimen . It was strange . I like to think of care partnership -- not care giving .
Yes, it's true. Unfortunately, eastern medicine has not undertaken any serious study of the fundamentals of illness, cause, and cure - and thus cannot challenge western medicine, even when it cures. Western medicine defines most diseases as incurable. When eastern medicine cures them, they are out of scope, anecdotal cures. Nobody notices that every cure is a single case, an anecdote..
Have you been cured by an illegal medicine?
This is a very important question, but it is only half of the story. To provide a complete picture, we also need to know “Have you been harmed by a legal medicine?” Then, we could make some statistics, and calculate costs and benefits of both approaches.
To have an ideal, perfectly complete image, we also would need two more questions: “When in need of medical support, a) have you been helped by non-medical personnel, b) have you been left behind by medical personnel?”
Numbers-wise, the results may be interesting, but still incomplete. We should first define what is “illegal” and decide whether something “illegal” in one location but “legal” in any other place of the world is really “illegal”.
As a complement to the picture, it would also be interesting to answer a question: “In the situation when your medical conditions became diagnosed/detected/reported, have legal medicine workers provide you with effective preventive measures to contain the situation? If not, how much of the resulting health damages may be attributed to the withdrawal or absence of such preventive measures?”
What appears an easy question is no longer such if we would like to assess all obvious factors in play.
Yes, of course. Interesting. This discussion and analysis has a lot more depth than I could cover in a single post. We also need to be aware that illegal is a judgement, not a physical reality, that cured - or benefited, and also harmed are judgements. Many cures entail harm. In addition, for example, there are many, for example, who would judge themselves harmed by a vaccination, and others who might claim to be harmed, or at least threatened by those who refuse a vaccination treatment. I study cure, not preventatives, and the point I want to make is that most curatives and curative actions are currently illegal. And that most "legal" medicines (permitted by prescription law, not legal outside of the definitined legal use) medicines are not curative.
Your article, short and easy, I thought initially, is actually a huge challenge to the entire healthcare system, from legal to patient. Theoretically definitions are already in place, along with rules and licenses. But there are so many habits and historical attitudes worldwide, some are good, some are better. If we are talking about a global village and one civilization, why don’t we choose the best protocols and treatment modalities from all over the place? Obviously, folk medicine is another factor. Undeniable, effective, amazingly cheap, it could be (is?) seen as a threat by the pharma, but then, are we (the species) here to feed the pharma alone? Shouldn’t we have a list of priorities in which finances are the last item?
Considering the complexity, I’m afraid it’s a lost case and will remain theoretical for ever, unless someone makes lobbying illegal and nationalizes the whole medical sector. Ha.
Thanks for commenting. We need more discussion. Yes, we need a sense of humor as well.
I study and write about cure. It is important to understand that CURED is not defined, neither in theory nor in practice, for most diseases. We have no medical no scientific test of cured for most cases of disease, even those that are easily cured, like the common cold.
When we study cure, we can also see two important things.
First - most illnesses and most cases of illness are easily cured, so we ignore the cures and claim "there is no cure for... the common cold, influenza, measles, COVID..."
Second, once we realize that an illness is cured by addressing the cause, and start studying actual cases - we quickly learn that for every case of disease there are many different cures and the best cure depends on the case, not on the disease name. In the case of scurvy, for example, there is one theoretical "treatment" and different references recommend different doses - all avoid the word cure. James Lind, on the other hand, wrote in the 1750s, that there were many cures for scurvy. I wrote a paper that scratched the surface of curing scurvy, and found many more types of scurvy and many more cures than were considered by James Lind or anyone else who has studied scurvy since Lind's famous paper. . http://theoryofcure.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/A_Treatise_of_Curing_Scurvy_Theory_and_P.pdf
Many of those cures would be considered "non-standard" treatments, and might be illegal in today's medical systems which function with "Standards of Care" but no Standards of Cure. .
tracy
The reason why “care” or SOPs are defined, while “cure” is absent, may be very simple: we don’t know how to cure. The whole healthcare system is based on “treating” symptoms, if at all. You can check it very easily: ask any doctor how many patients they have cured. If they are honest, they will say “None”. Because the system is focused on “treating” illnesses (if at all) - while illness (or discomfort or distress of any sort) is only a symptom of the patient being unbalanced.
The medical science does not know it and will never know. Basically, it cannot know how to treat or cure because we have no access to the complete information about a) the human body, b) the interactions of the human body with the local environment), c) the interactions of the human body with non-local factors. The scientist can only see a snapshot of the patient, and an incomplete one. The medical practitioner is by definition so arrogant in their approach to the patient that they “diagnose” the patient without even visiting their home, place of rest, workplace or without learning about their daily interactions with other people - which are the strongest stressors of all.
Paradoxically enough, psychologists or psychiatrists (who both are non-medical professions) have better insights and can resolve physiological problems faster and more efficiently - but they cannot speak about “curing” a supposedly mental or emotional disturbance.
Since we do not observe the true causes, and in their full presentation, there cannot be any cure. This may be the reason why modern medicine is so obsessed with numbers and numerical results of tests and examinations - changing the numbers as a result of swallowing some artificial substance is defined in medicine as positive treatment outcome. Not “cure”, but at least some justification to absurd prices they want for their non-curing.
Clearly, you should not start any discussion about self-resolving health conditions: modern medicine has no idea what it is, why it happens, and how to tap into this curing potential.
A fascinating realm.
Being an arrogant troglodyte from the bush, and with no respect whatsover for authority, academia, scientists, doctors, nurses, or pharmaceutical establishments, I have no hesitation in saying that black slave has CURED my skin cancers.
I am so arrogant that, despite the outraged protestations of my betters and superiors, in September 2021, I lodged a legal challenge against the Australian Northern Territory Chief Medical Officer, citing section 51 of the Australian Constitution, the Privacy Act 1988, and the Nuremberg Code. I even conveyed the document copies to the ill-fated Nuremberg II committee in London, with copies for the Police Union. (To their historical credit, in the NT, police refused to attack mRNA jab mandate protestors).
The criminal CMO, Heggie, was rewarded with the post of NT Administrator, but two Chief Ministers thus far, have resigned.
Yes this is a perspective I have explored in depth. Most doctors avoid the word cure, and many patients avoid it as well. Most medicines make no claim to cure - most cures are illegal in some way.
However, when we step out if the medical paradigm, it's not hard to define cure.
"An illness is cured when its present cause has been successfully addressed." An elementary illness, also known as an element of illness, has a single present cause. Addressing the cause produces a cure. If the cause occurs again, it's a new case of illness.
Most diseases, however, cannot be diagnosed until there are multiple present causes - so most diseases require multiple cures. "Modern medicine" wants to find a single cure for any disease - and that flawed logic leads to the belief that every disease is incurable. Modern medicine also wants cures to be permanent, a nonsense goal. If the cause occurs anew, a new case of illness will result.
> An illness is cured when its present cause has been successfully addressed.
> An elementary illness, also known as an element of illness, has a single present cause.
However attractive it sounds (easy work ahead), I doubt the underlying processes are that simple. For the starters, we don’t know what constitutes the beginning, what is the starting point of any life process or any process within a living organism. The first person who comes to this understanding will be the undisputed tyrant of the new world, because finding the single point of origin may mean finding the key to immortality. No chance for our current state of the mind. Let us keep it this way for our own sake.
From what we can analyze, any illness is a multi-faceted unbalancing of the processes in the mind-body-soul. A simple headache produces an avalanche of reactions in various systems. We can overcome some by the force of the will or at the expense of more serious unbalancing of some areas, but the complexity is overwhelming. A white pill can take it all away in a few minutes, but it’s only about partial chemistry. Symptoms are gone, but the reason(s) remain secret. Are they of electrical, magnetic, frequency, color, or any other nature? We don’t know. We actually make problems much worse with our modern medical technology, like magnetic resonance - literally killing the source magnetic field of the human body. The patient won’t die from this procedure, so we “assume” it is “safe”, but the truth is we don’t know because we don’t follow up on people who were subject to a systemic destruction of their magnetic field by the MR procedure. One such session could be potentially enough to unbalance the whole body for life - and then a single present cause is simply a wrong approach.
TCM cures are an amazing source of information and insight. You have problems with finances which make you lose self-confidence and make you prone to physical weakening? Easy. Lose your shoes, walk barefoot in contact with the natural earth, and your problems are gone after two weeks. For a Chinese practicing TCM this is obvious and is 100% verifiable. For us it may seem absurd. Why? Because our medicine doesn’t even look at the interaction of the human body with 5 or 6 primordial elements, not to mention spatial (geographical) orientation and timing (within a day, week, month or year) where and how we sleep, work, eat or converse in business or family matters. All these activities are governed by different factors, but we don’t care. What if “they” are right and all our medical approach is wrong? Healing practice certainly suggests so, as well as our history - we survived thousands of years without a doctor, so why would one be suddenly indispensable AD 2024?
All in all, I think that trying to resolve the “cure” problem within the medical paradigm is a wrong approach from the start. The medical field is limited by design and cannot be otherwise. Life processes, or causes of stressors and spontaneous resolutions, go beyond physical, measurable, predictable A>B equations. What if the “illness” does not exist? What if the comprehensive balance of the body is the source of baseline health? Psychosomatic approaches seem to verify this attitude, just as regular psychology does. How to self-define and maintain this comprehensive balance and to prevent its disturbing? Are we leaving the curing realm and entering the realm of prescriptions for living in harmony?
I am still working through your article with your definitions/concepts, but thanks for this clear expose of how cures have been made illegal through history. I will be sharing this article among my networks tomorrow to see if we can help find more folks with such anecdotes to share.
Thanks for your support Gary!
Love this!
One must be careful in choice of words, but let me say that in ten years I have used black salve (Cansema) to cure some 42 skin cancers, including one doubly clinically diagnosed (biopsy, twice) squamous cell carcinoma. The carcinoma was biopsied/ removed surgically and clinically diagnosed, which grew back in twenty years, but much bigger. Another biopsy-proved squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed but I packed the hole with black salve (no sleep with the pain for a week) and after 12 days the cancer fell out, as it always does with this treatement. Acting on online expert advice (I won't mention the familiar names) I am currently taking one Ivermectin tablet per day as a preventive. It seems to be working. I know of 20 cures for cancer and I know that no Sickness Industry treatment cures, unless it is surgery of a large area, followed by plastic surgery, which is expensive and is only offered to those who can afford it. All other treatments eventually kill the patient.
May I add that I have conceived of a cure for this genocidal plague but I will only reveal this after the event.
Keep up the great work, Tracy.
Thanks for your comment Tony. I had not heard of black salve except in the work of Harry Hoxsey and his cancer cure claims - also illegal. Did you notice, in your cured cases - that our medical systems have no test for "cancer cured"? They don't dare to develop any CURED test that is independent of the treatment, because it would open the door to many real cures including illegal ones.
Our medical systems generally claim that "cancer is incurable" but a simple analysis of the data show most cases of cancers are cured.
healthicine.org/wordpress/most-cancers-are-easily-cured/
To your health, tracy
I suppose I should add that black salve comes with caveats. The ointment works in exactly 12 days but if one wants to contain it permanently, one must eliminate sugar from one's diet. Alcohol too. A whole lot of foods are proscribed and others recommended.
I have read of medical investigations into black salve but they deliberately sabotage the tests. They know it works and will stall this forever. I have been attacked by hospital doctors for using black salve, and once, when a lip cancer treatment caused one side of my face to blow up like a baloon (the cancer must have spread unnoticed), and the pain was above ten, so I went to the hospital for pain killers. I refused the PCR test (knowing it was contaminated) and the doctor refused to give me painkillers.
I haven't been cured by an illegal medicine, although I've tried many of them. So far, nothing has worked.
If you believe nothing has worked you might find this interesting
https://open.substack.com/pub/tracykolenchuk/p/curanoia-fear-of-cures-curing-and?r=pnuw3&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Great article, Tracy! Yes, a whole-food plant-based diet (as per Dr. Joel Fuhrman's Nutritarian approach) cured me of being overweight, because even regular aerobic exercise did not take the weight off. Also, I do not get sick like I did before making the dietary change, as in "not ever"!
Thanks Sharine. Is Fuhrrman's book an illegal cure? It says "This book is not intended as a substitute for medical advice from a physician. A physician should be consulted if one is on medication or if there are any symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical attention. This book was current as of October 2010, and as new information becomes available through research, experience, or changes to product contents, some of the data in this book may become invalid. You should seek the most up to date information on your medical care and treatment from your physician or health care professional." Perhaps that doesn't quite make it illegal, it's just illegal to "claim it cures,' anything... Because a doctor should have been consulted. And everyone knows doctors cannot "cure" someone who is overeweight. There is also no test of "cured" for any condition that might have been cured by Furhman... So it's probably illegal to "call it a cure" and certainly illegal to market it as a "cure."
"So it's probably illegal to "call it a cure" and certainly illegal to market it as a "cure.""
Precisely. He can't say his recommended diet cured someone's diabetes, for example (even though the diet was indeed the cure), because the medical board (of psychopathic tyrants) will pull his license.
Yes. What happens when diabetes is cured? Nothing. If anyone claims a cure there are only two options, either they are lying or the diagnosis was wrong. Diabetes is incurable. Case closed.
That is certainly true in the death-cult of pHARMakeia!
Left to my own devices , a youtube video made by an unknown angel introduced me to EMU oil as the only way to heal pressure wounds . My patient was a relative , and I was alone , so I was able to keep the wounds that appeared at bay with a non stick pad soaked in %100 Emu oil , after simply washing the wound with soap and water . She met her appointed hour , happened to be 11:11 am , a blessing for me , with her skin intact , no wounds . That was a prayer I asked god for and that is what happened . Now , I went on to another assignment , where my patient had total medical observation and had been suffering from terrible wounds - I told the patients in charge person that I had a solution to the problem , and brought some in to work . What Havoc ! Finally , it was forbidden , even though it was healing her wounds . Now I was in a bind , who was I working for ?? The patient , or the person who supposedly was in charge ? I would sneak in the oil onto her body , but could not do the correct application , which was to let it soak on , with a pad . Her feet healed , the Skin Doctor could not believe what he was seeing . I told him I could explain . He had no interest . He just said ' You are angels ' -- but did not want to know . Finally , I was forbidden to sing to my patient , and was supposed to let her cry herself to sleep at night . My heart started racing uncontrollably that night , and I had to quit my assignment . I went through this with Breastfeeding my own children , with "Letting them Play " etc etc . There is an avalanche of people now who were raised with love of power and rules , which has nothing to do with healing and love . I hope that your book gets some traction -- Oh , and when I told that Mayo Clinic doctor about the Emu oil, rather than GAUZE AND SALINE SOLUTION ???? on a lower spinal pressure wound ???? He became red in the face with fury , that I , an un educated care giver , would dare conflict with his care regimen . It was strange . I like to think of care partnership -- not care giving .
Thank you Jennifer. These are the stories we need to hear!
Yes, it's true. Unfortunately, eastern medicine has not undertaken any serious study of the fundamentals of illness, cause, and cure - and thus cannot challenge western medicine, even when it cures. Western medicine defines most diseases as incurable. When eastern medicine cures them, they are out of scope, anecdotal cures. Nobody notices that every cure is a single case, an anecdote..